Jaguar XF 2015 vs Mercedes E class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 10 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine Mercedes E klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 8 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mercedes E class is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |