Jaguar XF 2012 vs Honda Accord 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 190 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 260 NM more than Honda Accord. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.4 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Used also on Honda CR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda Accord 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda Accord 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 7 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 492 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 48 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`315 kg | 1`920 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`580 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 340 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem more than Honda Accord. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Honda Accord has
| |