Honda Accord 2015 Sedan
I am a fan of this model and there have been in previous year's models. All have served just perfect. Sufficiently comfortable and well-equipped car whose electronics engine as well as rolling part of our roads is just perfect.
read all Honda Accord reviews
This Honda is available with five petrol engines with displacement from 2.0 to 3.5 litres and power of from 150 to 281 horsepower.
The car is available with both automatic (5 versions), as well as manual (1 version) gearbox.
Honda Accord 2015 sedan average fuel consumption in combined cycle is from 7.4 to 9.2 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Honda Accord 2015 sedan version is Honda Accord 2.0, consuming 7.4 litres of petrol per 100km.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 7.2 seconds has Honda Accord 3.5 version, conversely the tardiest one is Honda Accord 2.0 reaching this speed only in 11.7 seconds. The maximum top speed is 230 km/h for the 3.0 petrol 249 hp version (Honda Accord 3.0) and the 3.5 petrol 6-cylinder 281 hp version (Honda Accord 3.5).
Lenght of Honda Accord is 489 cm, it is large car. For comparison - Honda Accord is about 1 cm longer than Mazda 6 sedan, but 2 cm shorter than BMW 5 series sedan. Honda Accord gross weight is from 1920 to 2060 kg (depending on modification), which is approximately the same as the average for cars of this age and class. Honda Accord trunk space is 492 litres.
This Honda is relatively cheap - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 11 000 €. Below you will find more detailed information about Honda Accord prices and costs.
Honda Accord modifications
Modification | Engine | Power | Consumption | Gearbox |
---|---|---|---|---|
Honda Accord 2015 2.0
Most fuel efficient version |
2.0 Petrol | 150 HP | 7.4 l/100km | Automatic |
Honda Accord 2015 2.4 180 Hp
Only version with manual transmission |
2.4 Petrol | 180 HP | 7.9 l/100km | Manual (6) |
Honda Accord 2015 2.4 180 Hp Automatic | 2.4 Petrol | 180 HP | 8.2 l/100km | Automatic (5) |
Honda Accord 2015 2.4 188 Hp | 2.4 Petrol | 188 HP | 7.7 l/100km | Automatic |
Honda Accord 2015 3.0 | 3.0 Petrol | 249 HP | 9.2 l/100km | Automatic (6) |
Honda Accord 2015 3.5
Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 7.2 seconds |
3.5 Petrol | 281 HP | 9.1 l/100km | Automatic (6) |
Honda Accord prices
Honda Accord 2015 - 2017 sedan price in Latvia is from 8500 € to 14500 €.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Honda Accord price is more below average - Honda Accord is approximately for 32 percents cheaper then average sedans of this age (compare sedans 2015 - 2017 prices). Despite of relatively low price Honda Accord quality is above average (see below), so this Honda can be a good buy.
Year | Lowest | Average | Highest | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Honda Accord 2015 price | 8500 € | 11 000 € | 14 500 € |
Honda Accord total costs of ownership
How much really costs to own Honda Accord? To calculate the Honda Accord total running costs, including the purchase, insurance, maintenance costs as well as taxes and other costs, click year of production
Honda Accord 2015 Honda Accord 2016 Honda Accord 2017
Honda Accord 2015 sedan features (options)
Percentage of Honda Accord with corresponding feature (option)
100% Rain sensor
100% Tire pressure control
83% Xenon headlights
83% Metallic paint
83% Conditioning
33%
Honda Accord 2015 sedan photo images
Similar cars to Honda Accord 2015
Cars similar and most compared to Honda Accord 2015. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.
- better manoeuvrability
- lower price
- lower fuel consumption
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
- petrol and diesel engines available
- lower price
- automatic transmission only
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- available with 4x4 drive
- petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
- lower fuel consumption
- available with 4x4 drive
- roomier boot
- petrol and diesel engines available
- lower fuel consumption
Honda Accord reviews
Total 14 Honda Accord owner reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Honda Accord.
Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 43`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 145 € (~ 72 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: I am a fan of this model and there have been in previous year's models. All have served just perfect. Sufficiently comfortable and well-equipped car whose electronics engine as well as rolling part of our roads is just perfect.
Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (7 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 21 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 73`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 990 € (~ 247 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: If there is no rust and it car is beeing followed up, the car doesn't actually rust, 3 years in a row technicak inspection passed without any remarks. Here and there of course rust bubbles appear now, after our frost winters and age of 13 years.
Low fuel consumption when driving alone with a full tank on a highway cruise 95km / h and 5 speed fuel consumption 4.5l / 100km, full car then 5.5l / 100km highway. The average city + highway cycle 6l / 100km is therefore such an average consumption, but mostly it is a little below 6L or as the manufacturer has indicated - 5.8l / 100km.
Quite a spacious car, for two + 8-year-old child calmly lowers the benches, throws a mattress and can comfortably spend the night in the trunk on any summer trip.
High-quality premum audio system with active subwoofer, does not even demand better for everyday use. Rolling keeps Latvian roads very well, in 4 years I have replaced only 2 bushings and 2 stabilizers in rolling stock.
The seat is comfortable, half-leather, I drove from Riga to the LT / PL border without stopping and did not even want to get off. I am 178cm tall, only if you are taller then I could start to be narrow because for me the distance of the seat is standing at the end position. I would say that if it was about 5cm longer, then there could be problems with comfort.
Good and sharp steering.
If you find it rusty then I recommend this model, because it is suitable for both more aggressive driving and family trips.
Cons: I have one of the last 7th generation that rolled off the assembly line in Japan (facelift model), but not aux / usb in the original equipment, although the navigation radio has such an output, honda does not offer to buy separately (I requested dealer). I had ordered some Chinese miracle from ebay but sounded miserable, now there is a good BT modulator and I make a living with it.
It could be a bit more powerful, because if there is a full car, then you have to overtake. The turbine satarts to work only from 1800 RPM until then there is no overtaking capacity, so if on a cruise for example on 1200RPM and press accelerator ... it takes some time, but when the turbine turns on then the car goes to the end of the clock. But either the lack of power can't scream terribly and is satisfying on daily trips. Of course there is no ´dragreisist´ with 140hp, but if you are alone, then it also allows you to provoke more aggressively ...
I really don't like ´facelift´ Japanese invention that the DVD card reader is in front of you in the console (before the facelift there were normal shelves.) The DVD card disc puts in well if 1x in life .... I understand if you could watch DVD movies on the navigation screen ... but no! read only the map. It would have been better to have left the shelf and put the reader somewhere in a trivial place.
The sound insulation is not good, when entering the highway during the rain, it seems that the sound passes through the whole can.
The ground clearance could have been at least a couple of cm higher because it is quite low and every now and then when entering the forest I had to look for an alternative path.
As already mentioned, quite thin layer of lacquer and easily scratches, but the body is galvanized and one deeper scratch that has passed under the paint layer, even after 3 LV winters has not turned into a rust stain. That's why everyone who sees honda has rust - guess ... That's not all! There are no more 90s products when honda did not galvanized the body ....
Purchase year: | 2007 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 170`000 kilometers (8 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.2 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 55 € (~ 55 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Well equipped, elastic engine sufficiently dynamic and comfortable car. A responsive and obedient steering response. Sufficiently economic. For family car roomy interior - 5 adults can feel free inside. A good cabin ergonomics. Dependable car - a positive sense, because you can be sure that it will not fail you.
Cons: Plan polish / paint coating - easily scraping even when dealing with small branches. Could be better sound insulation - audible road bumps. Interior trim materials become noisy over time - tend to issue a variety of noises. Compared with German analogues less lifting capacity.
Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 300`000 kilometers (10 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 30 € (~ 3 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very reliable car, proportionate repair costs.
Cons: Sound proofing of cabin
Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 220`000 kilometers (11 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 50 € (~ 4 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Durable running gear
Cons: After 10 years use rust appeared on arches. Often front lamps burn out.
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 520 € (~ 173 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Convenient, good-looking, reliable, good drivability - have set up a Eibach springs pro kit, which made driving even more sporty and confortable. 2.0 engine accelerates feom 0 km/h to 100 km/h in 9 seconds, which is much faster, than mentioned in article here.
Cons: Regular problems with handbrake (annually), steams up lamps in front. Easy scraping bodywork - varnish soft.
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 600 € (~ 300 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A very comfortable car, a quiet engine, which works with chain, as well as a dynamic enough for daily city driving.
Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 30 € (~ 10 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very nice car
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.1 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 1.8 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 235 € (~ 58 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 325 € (~ 325 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, spacious, dependable
Cons: Boring - its feel not fun to drive; Very large turning radius (manoeuvrability as container ship); Poor visibility in side; Fuel consumption is not as stated;bad sound insulation