Jaguar XF 2012 vs Chrysler 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 287 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 53 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Chrysler 200. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.1 | |
| Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 510 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 200) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler 200 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Chrysler 200 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 200 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 9 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 155 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`315 kg | 2`087 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`622 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 465 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Chrysler 200. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |