Jaguar XE 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XE engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW 4 series, but torque is 50 NM more than BMW 4 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XE consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XE consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 4 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XE is 3 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 26 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.66 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.36 metres more than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`235 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |