Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 10 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate. Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel. Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.85 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Pace has 113 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 1284 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |