Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 3 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.85 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Pace has 132 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 500 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |