Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Ford Kuga 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 27 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.1 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar E-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1386 litres | 1534 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 148 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`245 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |