Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Ford Kuga 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 300 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 430 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.3 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 1.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | 1534 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 166 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 148 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`670 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |