Isuzu D-Max 2012 vs Nissan Navara 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Isuzu D-Max is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 403 - 550 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 13 seconds | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.4 | 8.3 - 9.5 | |
On average, Isuzu D-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.30 m | 5.34 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Isuzu D-Max is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Isuzu D-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 13.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Isuzu D-Max is 1.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Isuzu D-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`000 | ~ 2`873 | |
Safety: | |||
Isuzu D-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Navara is better rated in child safety tests. The Isuzu D-Max scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 15 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu D-Max has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |