Isuzu D-Max 2012 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 - 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 314 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 13 seconds | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.4 | 7.7 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, Isuzu D-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Isuzu D-Max is larger. Isuzu D-Max is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Isuzu D-Max is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`000 | ~ 2`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu D-Max has
|
| |