Isuzu D-Max 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.5 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 150 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 375 - 470 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 13 seconds | 10.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.4 | 8.5 - 10.4 | |
On average, Isuzu D-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Isuzu D-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm wider, while the height of Isuzu D-Max is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Isuzu D-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Isuzu D-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`000 | ~ 1`123 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. The Isuzu D-Max scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 19 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu D-Max has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |