Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 383 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 54 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 161 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |