Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 14 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 161 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |