Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 184 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 383 NM | 165 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.8 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
Hyundai ix35 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Hyundai ix35 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 161 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Hyundai ix35 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`041 | ~ 1`924 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |