Hyundai Tucson 2005 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.61 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 644 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Nissan Qashqai has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai Tucson, so Nissan Qashqai quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |