Hyundai Tucson 2016 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 49 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.6 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Tucson and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1525 litres | |
| Hyundai Tucson has 17 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q3 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |