Hyundai Santa FE 2001 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 15 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Santa FE is 12 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 850 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Hyundai Santa FE has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Hyundai Santa FE, so Hyundai Santa FE quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |