Hyundai Santa FE 2001 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Hyundai Santa FE torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Santa FE is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 850 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |