Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Hyundai Kona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Kona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai Kona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Hyundai Kona 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
| Hyundai Kona is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Kona has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |