Hyundai Elantra 2003 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 143 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 235 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.4 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
On average, the Hyundai Elantra petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 3. On average, Hyundai Elantra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Hyundai Elantra is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Elantra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1401 litres | 1229 litres | |
|
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Elantra has 115 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Elantra (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Hyundai Elantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`816 | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |