Honda Jazz 2004 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 - 83 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 119 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 5.8 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but higher. Honda Jazz is 58 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 1229 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 94 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`465 | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |