Honda Insight 2009 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Honda Insight engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Insight is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Insight consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Honda Insight over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Insight consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Honda Insight is smaller. Honda Insight is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Insight is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 635 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`725 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Insight has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |