Honda HR-V 2015 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda HR-V is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | no data | |
| Honda HR-V has 1 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |