Honda HR-V 2001 vs Land Rover Freelander 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 7 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda HR-V consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 27 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda HR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |