Honda FR-V 2004 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Honda FR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda FR-V engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Toyota Corolla Verso. Thanks to more power Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda FR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda FR-V consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda FR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda FR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda FR-V 2004 2.0 engine Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Honda FR-V is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda FR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda FR-V has 16 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. The Toyota Corolla Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Honda FR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |