Honda FR-V 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Honda FR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Ford C-Max. Despite the higher power, Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda FR-V consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda FR-V could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda FR-V consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda FR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda FR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda FR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda FR-V is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda FR-V is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Honda FR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |