Honda Civic 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 126 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Civic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda Civic 2008 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda Civic 2008 2.2 engine Toyota Auris 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Auris 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 354 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 761 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Honda Civic has 101 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Civic (by 589 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`890 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |