Honda Civic 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 50 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Honda Civic 2008 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda Civic 2008 2.2 engine Toyota Auris 2010 1.4 engine: Toyota introduced this 1.4-liter turbocharged diesel engine in 2001, and production continued until 2017. It features a Bosch Common Rail fuel injection system, initially equipped with electromagnetic injectors until 2008. These were later replaced by non-repairable ... More about Toyota Auris 2010 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 354 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1335 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Honda Civic has 101 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Civic (by 15 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`760 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |