Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Ford Tourneo engine produces 45 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Ford Tourneo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller, but higher. Ford Tourneo is 44 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Tourneo has 220 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |