Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Tourneo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Tourneo engine produces 45 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Tourneo could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Tourneo is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Ford Tourneo has 469 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |