Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Tourneo engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan Evalia (NV200), whereas torque is 87 NM more than Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Tourneo could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Evalia (NV200) might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Tourneo is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Evalia (NV200), 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
| |