Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 291 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Tourneo engine produces 141 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that by driving the Ford Tourneo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Tourneo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller, but higher. Ford Tourneo is 76 cm shorter than the Chrysler Pacifica, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | 915 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3979 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Tourneo has 114 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Pacifica. The Chrysler Pacifica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Chrysler Pacifica, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`724 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 33 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |