Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving. Ford Tourneo engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Ford Tourneo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Tourneo is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Ford Tourneo has 469 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |