Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Renault Trafic 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 150 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 240 NM | 260 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 14.7 seconds | 15.1 - 19 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 8.0 | 6.6 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, Ford Tourneo equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller. Ford Tourneo is 56 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | 2150 litres | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Ford Tourneo has 1121 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 1.8 metres less than that of the Renault Trafic, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`033 | ~ 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |