Ford Tourneo 2014 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 - 150 HP | 75 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 170 - 240 NM | 145 - 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 14.7 seconds | 11.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 8.0 | 4.3 - 8.2 | |
Ford Tourneo petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kangoo. On average, Ford Tourneo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
Ford Tourneo is larger. Ford Tourneo is 15 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Tourneo is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1029 litres | 660 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Ford Tourneo has 369 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`033 | ~ 1`967 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 25 600 | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |