Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 143 HP178 HP
Torque: 330 NM261 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds13.6 seconds
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Ranger engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 69 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.912.2
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Ranger consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres88 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway880 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.90 m
Width: 1.81 m1.88 m
Height: 1.76 m1.87 m
Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 12 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 1500 litres215 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data215 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 1500 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1790 litres
Turning diameter: 13 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`0202`810
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 760011 800
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv