Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 178 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 261 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 69 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 12.2 | |
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 88 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 12 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1500 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 2`810 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |