Ford Ranger 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 235 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 615 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 92 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 285 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.0 | |
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 93 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.95 m | |
Ford Ranger is 13 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 701 litres | |
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 799 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 20 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |