Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi L 200 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |