Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 130 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 12.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Ranger is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |