Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mazda BT-50 2006

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Mazda BT-50
2006 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP143 HP
Torque: 330 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12.5 seconds
Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.9
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway890 km on highway
Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 205 mm (8.1 inches)207 mm (8.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.08 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litresno data
Turning diameter: 13 meters12.5 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`0203`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 7200no data
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda BT-50 has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv