Ford Ranger 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 129 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 310 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 100 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 13 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 535 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 965 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |