Ford Ranger 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP143 HP
Torque: 330 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12.5 seconds
Ford Ranger 2006 and Ford Ranger 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Ranger 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.9
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway890 km on highway
660 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Ford Ranger 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 205 mm (8.1 inches)203 mm (8 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.08 m
Width: 1.81 m1.72 m
Height: 1.76 m1.75 m
Ford Ranger 2006 and Ford Ranger 2006 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litres1500 litres
Turning diameter: 13 metersno data
Gross weight: 3`020 kg3`070 kg
Net weight:1`955 kg1`845 kg
Load capacity:1`065 kg1`225 kg
Ford Ranger 2006 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Ford Ranger 2006. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2006 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 66007200
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • lower price
Ford Ranger has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv