Ford Ranger 2006 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 97 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Ranger is 1 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Ranger has 725 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q7. The Audi Q7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |