Ford Ranger 2006 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 90 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Ranger is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`020 kg | 2`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`955 kg | 2`295 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`065 kg | 695 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than Audi Q7. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |