Ford Ranger 2010 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 47 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 32 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.7 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |