Ford Ranger 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger 2010 and Ford Ranger 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Ranger 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger 2010 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger 2010 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford Ranger 2010 is larger. Ford Ranger 2010 and Ford Ranger 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |