Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 47 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 80 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |