Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Ranger) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 47 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 194 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |