Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2010
Mitsubishi L 200
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.5 Diesel
Petrol engines (Ford Ranger) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 143 HP136 HP
Torque: 209 NM314 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14.6 seconds
Ford Ranger engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 105 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.6
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.08 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.75 m1.78 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi L 200 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litresno data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data2`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 72008400
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv